It's the End of the World as We Know it

Share This Video About Trump and His Trash

Trump's Collusion, Lies. and Treason

In this video you will hear Rudy Giuliani admit to collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian spies. You will hear Trump denying that he knows Putin. You will also hear Trump denying that he does business with Russia or has loans with Russian banks. I addition to that you will hear Trump promising to release his taxes.

How to Deal With Trump's Mob In 5 Easy Steps

1. Arrest all of them.

2. Interrogate all of them.

3. Put all of them on trial by a military tribunal.

4. Convict them.

5. Publicly Execute all of them and let God sort them out.

When Trump is gone, the disease will remain. Just like when the allies purged Germany of much of the Nazi slime America must be purged of the disease that put Trump and the other criminals in power. Nuremberg worked wonders. 

Let Let The Madness Begin

Great Youtube Political Talk Show

How to Lawfully Intimidate Trump's Thugs

1. Record them and their licence plates and VIN numbers. Let them see you doing it. If they question you remain silent or say, "You'll find out."

2. Ask to see their ID and if they refuse say,  Don't say you are a cop but act like a cop bur Ask them, "Are you refusing the show me your ID?"  Record them.

3. Do a Private Person's Arrest  PPA on them if your state allows it, if they assault you.

4. Follow them home and record them getting out of their car.

5. Goad them into making a threat, record it and then have them arrested.

6. Wear a dark cop style glasses as a you and your group records and surrounds one of them.

7. Goad then into making a death threat towards a Democrat.

8. If you have to use violence try to cause permanent damage to the thugs.  A thumb jammed into one of their eyes will blind them. They will carry that reminder of their depravity for life. 

Keep in mind, like Trump, his supporters are cowards with big mouths.

Republican Males Are Unmanly

Enemies List

Here is a partial list of America's Domestic Enemies Who are on Twitter. We know they are enemies and we should be treating them as such!




@j_Borders
@CongressmanJVD
@NRA
@DonaldJTrumpJr
@EricTrump 

Moscow Mitch ---> @SenateMajLdr


@DevinNunes

@Jim_Jordan
@IvankaTrump
@AGWillliamBarr
@BetsyDeVos
@KellyAnnConnway
@SarahHuckabee
@GovMikeHuckabee
@DanScavino
@kayleighmcenany
Corey R. Lewandowski @CLewandowski_
@TeamTrump
@KatrinaPierson Team Trump Senior Advisor
One America News Propaganda @OANN
@DineshDSouza
@mattgaetz @RepMattGaetz
Jeanine Pirro @JudgeJeanine
@Jim_Jordan
Two Trump Whores @DiamondandSilk
@RealBenCarson
@SecretaryCarson
@seanhannity

@RandPaul
@Jim_Jordan

@ProudNavyMom

@jperky1956
@avi29nash

@truedream416

Enemies list!
@j_Borders  @CongressmanJVD @NRA @DonaldJTrumpJr @EricTrump
Moscow Mitch ---> @SenateMajLdr @DevinNunes @Jim_Jordan  @IvankaTrump @AGWillliamBarr @BetsyDeVos @KellyAnnConnway  @SarahHuckabee @GovMikeHuckabee @DanScavino @TeamTrump @kayleighmcenany @GOP
 Corey R. Lewandowski @CLewandowski_  @EliseStefanik

@RealBenCarson @SecretaryCarson
@KatrinaPierson Team Trump Senior Advisor
One America News Propaganda @OANN @DineshDSouza  @mattgaetz @RepMattGaetz
Jeanine Pirro @JudgeJeanine @Jim_Jordan Two Trump Whores @DiamondandSilk
@seanhannity
@RandPaul @Jim_Jordan @ProudNavyMom @jperky1956  @avi29nash
@truedream416
MORE SLIME
@MacNutt77 @ShielaHammond4 @replouiegohmert @eichstadt_janie <---- enemy
@Franklin_Graham
@RepMikeJohnson
 @hogangidley45
 @jeremydys
@RepMarkMeadows
@stclairashley

  

Youtube Google Shadow Banning

Shadowbanned from Youtube Comments If you visit the above link you will see that the scum running Youtube and Google ended the discussion after on comment. Below is the original concern expressed by original poster Murrillable 

After months of not being able to comment properly I figured it was time to start a proper discussion about the issue.

It's been no secret that the Youtube Comment system has undergone many drastic changes over the years. Some of the changes/minor improvements to the commenting system users have been notified about, most however, have not.

I first began to notice something was awry when I suddenly stopped receiving any and all notifications regarding comment responses, as well as upvotes. Any comment I would leave would simply stagnate, and be completely ignored by users.

I never wanted to believe Youtube would implement something as sinister as a shadowban feature to silence specific users with undesirable opinions without their knowledge, so I decided to test my theory by commenting with a separate account.

And, sure enough, the comment from the alternate account showed up just fine, while my original account's comment only appeared visible via the shadowbanned account itself, and otherwise did not exist. This was repeated on several videos to insure it was not simply because I had been blocked by a specific user. Confirmed shadowban.

Normally this wouldn't be that big of an issue, since I would simply use alternate accounts to comment (as inconvenient and unnecessary as that already is) however, it has recently come to my attention that those accounts have been shadowbanned as well.

Now I've already taken the liberty of visiting countless help threads myself before posting about this issue. And a common theme among them seems to be that many users will simply brush this aside as if it's simply another "bug" that Youtube hasn't been bothered to fix. A particular help discussion in question took place in 2014. You'd think a simple bug would have been fixed within the course of three years, but no, it clearly hasn't...unless of course it's not a bug at all, but a feature.

It boggles my mind how countless spam bots and fraudulent accounts make it past Youtube's abysmal filters on a daily basis, yet for some reason I am unable to do something as simple as comment on videos.

Only one other comment was allowed before some censoring cancer deserving dick sucker closed the discussion. Here's that comment.

munky342

I am also noticing this. I have had many, heated shall we say, discussions on youtube recently. All completely civil, but all about similar subjects. Mainly bigotry. I firmly believe that youtube is censoring these comments or just my account. Whether deliberate or not.

I do not like being censored, especially when it is done in an underhanded way. Even more so when the comment below mine will say, and I quote  "every muslim is a terrorist and should be shot in the head, especially the children because they will grow into terrorists"

Now that's a comment I wouldn't mind being censored, but mine are usually just pointing out that bigotry isn't going to make this all disappear.

Instead its my comments that disappear. As evidenced by me logging in with a separate account.

Youtube's fuckery caught up with them when Youtube creator Nasim Najafi Aghdam showed up armed at their headquarters and opened fire on them. They fucked with her livelihood and payed the price for their fuckery. While I would not advocate this sort of violence against those corporate tyrants but I would have a tough time convicting someone who killed a bunch of tyrants. Youtube/Google has fucked with a lot of creators and I'm surprised this has been the only incidence of violence especially given their long history of criminal wrong doing. While the slime at Youtube was censoring and shadow banning and otherwise fucking with content creators such as the allowed Alex Jones and other right wing scum such as Steven Crowder to spread their poisonous and lies. Youtube will ban a creator for saying fuck or for saying something unpopular that offends the sensibilities of some member of the thought police but if a channel is creating revenue for Youtube, Youtube's purposely vague and ambiguous rules will not apply. 

Youtube Thug CEO Susan Wojcicky

Will another disgruntled Youtube creator go postal? Who knows? But if another angry tortured youtube creator does does lay waste to another bunch of Youtube lackeys, 99% of the blame is on Youtube and Youtube CEO Susan Wojcicky has a lot of the blood on her hands YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki along with many other rat bastard corporate gangsters including Google CEO Sundar Pichai  and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, and all the other filthy rich trash associated with them. 

If another Youtuber such as Nasim Najafi Aghdam flips his or her wig due to Youtube fuckery and attacks with violence, I really doubt anyone with a moral center will shed a tear. 

YouTube headquarters shooting - Wikipedia 

A Dangerous Twitter Troll Warning Probably Russian or Trumpanzee

430 mutuals of you are following: @ kdawgo Please be careful. They believe the mass shootings have all been Staged, have issues with the LGBTQ community & something about the 11th number, Tree of Life, Trump's speech and shooting today. Scary stuff.

Doxx the fucker if you can.

Joni Ernst: Republican Criminal Caught With Illegal Donations

WASHINGTON (AP) — An outside group founded by top political aides to Sen. Joni Ernst has worked closely with the Iowa Republican to raise money and boost her reelection prospects, a degree of overlap that potentially violates the law, documents obtained by The Associated Press show.

Iowa Values, a political nonprofit that is supposed to be run independently, was co-founded in 2017 by Ernst's longtime consultant, Jon Kohan. It shares a fundraiser, Claire Holloway Avella, with the Ernst campaign. And a condo owned by a former aide — who was recently hired to lead the group — was used as Iowa Values' address at a time when he worked for her.

Political nonprofits are often referred to as “dark money” groups because they can raise unlimited sums and are not required to reveal their donors. But they must take steps to keep their activities separate from the candidates they support. Additionally, while such tax-exempt groups can do political work, they can’t make it their primary purpose.

The documents reviewed by the AP, including emails and a strategy memo, not only make clear that the group’s aim is securing an Ernst win in 2020, but they also show Ernst and her campaign worked in close concert with Iowa Values.

Ernst is hardly the first politician to push campaign finance law boundaries. But the revelation could complicate her efforts to fend off a Democratic challenger in a closely watched race next year.

Crazy/Stupid Republican of the Day: Joni Ernst- 2019 Update

“The truth is, our campaign is completely separate and independent from any outside organization," Ernst senior adviser Brook Ramlet a likely pedophile said in a statement. “Our campaign always has and always will act in full compliance with and in the spirit of the law. For the AP to suggest otherwise, is the definition of fake news.”

Campaign finance law states that candidates and their “agents” can't solicit, direct or spend contributions that exceed federal limits, even if the donations are made to an outside group. Those limits currently prevent donors from giving more than $2,800 to a candidate and $5,000 to a political action committee per election.

In July, Holloway Avella requested “an investment of $50,000” from a donor after Ernst made an introduction. She made clear in an email, which was obtained by the AP, how much a contribution of that size could help.

“As a follow up to our introduction by Senator Ernst, I am reaching out to you on behalf of Iowa Values,” she wrote.

“As you may have seen, an outside group on the left ... recently launched a six-figure ad buy in media markets across the state attacking Senator Ernst on her vote to repeal Obamacare,” she continued. “The purpose of our group, Iowa Values, is to push back against these type of negative attacks.”

Separately, a strategy memo states the group will use door-knocking, as well as TV, radio and digital advertising, to build a “firewall” that could be the difference “between winning and losing in 2020 for Senator Ernst.” The group is targeting about 120,000 Iowans who “lean Republican on the issues” but abandon the party at times over “the tone of the GOP.”

Taken together, some legal experts say the documents offer proof that the effort violates the spirit of campaign finance and tax law, if not the letter of it.

“It seems like pretty strong evidence” that the $50,000 request was for an “illegal donation” while it's “clear that the goal of Iowa Values is to reelect Joni Ernst, which may violate its tax-exempt status,” said Brendan Fischer, an attorney with the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center in Washington.

He also said the documents pulled back the curtain on how dark money works.

“This is a striking example of how secret campaign money operates,” Fischer said. “The big donors that bankroll a dark money group like Iowa Values remain hidden from the public, but the politician that benefits knows where the money is coming from.”

Still, it’s far from certain that the Federal Election Commission, or the IRS, will find that they broke the law.

The FEC often gridlocks along partisan lines. And after a recent resignation, the panel doesn’t have enough members to legally meet for conducting business. Similarly, the IRS has shown little appetite for cracking down on dark money groups that push the limits.

“There’s a real disconnect between the principles behind the law and how they are enforced,” said Larry Noble, a former general counsel to the FEC who served under both Republican and Democratic administrations. Noble said he would need more details before assessing whether Ernst’s campaign broke the law. But, he added: “The bottom line is that this is really questionable.”

Dan Petalas, a former acting general counsel at the FEC, said that the “law is undecided” but that his personal view is the fundraising was permissible because lying whore Holloway Avella said she was requesting the $50,000 on behalf of Iowa Values, not the campaign.

In a statement, Iowa Values executive director Derek Flowers said the organization has “systems and controls in place to make certain that it complies with all laws” and is “careful to follow all requirements that limit how much of its activities can be focused on supporting candidates.”

What’s undeniable is the close connection between Ernst and the group.

Kohan, a former Ernst deputy chief of staff who is now a general consultant to her campaign, was paid $120,000 to serve as executive director of Iowa Values for two years, according to the group's tax filings. He left the group earlier this year. Jamestown Associates, where he is a named partner, also collected an additional $101,000 from Ernst’s campaign in the years he served as executive director.

Holloway Avella raised about $520,000 for Iowa Values in 2017 and 2018, tax records show. The group lists her Arlington, Virginia, office as one of its business addresses and paid her about $60,000. Ernst paid her an additional $363,000 those years, record show.

The group listed a Waukee, Iowa, condo owned by Flowers as another business address in 2017, records show. Flowers was campaign manager during Ernst’s 2014 Senate primary. A company called Midland Strategies, which has been paid $145,000 by Ernst since 2013, also listed Flowers’ condo as a business address. Flowers succeeded Kohan as the group's executive director this year.

After Ernst launched her reelection campaign, Holloway Avella was deeply involved with both operations.

Holloway Avella's website lets prospective donors request to host a fundraiser for the senator. And invitations for several recent Ernst events list her as an organizer, including two held in September at Bistro Bis, a French eatery a few blocks from the U.S. Capitol.

Around the same time, Holloway Avella was seeking donations for Iowa Values from prominent Ernst supporters, like dieting entrepreneur Jenny Craig and San Francisco philanthropist Diane “Dede” Wilsey. Craig previously gave $30,000 to Ernst; Wilsey donated $46,000.

A legal compliance letter Holloway Avella sent to donors underscored the delicate terrain.

Iowa Values’ mission “is to educate the lie to the public about common-sense Republican depravity and bullshit solutions to various public policy issues of national importance,” it stated. “It was not formed by any federal candidates or agents of candidates or at the direction or request of any candidates or an agent of a candidate.”

Trump and Money Laundering

Why the Trump Flip-Flop?

Before he became president, Trump and his children bragged about their Russian connections and all the money they had "pouring" in from Russian sources. But how much of the money was being laundered? How much of it came from highly questionable sources: the Russian Mafia, mobsters, oligarchs, perhaps even the Kremlin in order to compromise the recipients? After Trump and his companies defaulted on around $1 billion in debt, American banks and Wall Street refused to lend to Trump. 

Did Russians step in to fill the void? If so, what did they demand in return? How much "leverage" did they have to get Trump to do their bidding?  But what we do know is that Trump has completely changed his tune about his extensive business dealings in Russia. He now insists: "I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA — NO DEALS, NO LOANS, NO NOTHING!"

Trump's Toilet Talk Twitter

Trump is prolific on Twitter
As he tweets day and night from the shitter
Constipation of his brain
Make his tweets quite insane
And angry and stupid and bitter

There once was a traitor named Trump
Wants a toilet for his giant rump.
Sits on the Commode
His Twitter abode
Where he shits out a giant orange dump.

On the toilet Trump tweets out the word.
Like a giant dotard Tweet bird
He speaks to the South
More shit flies from his mouth
As Republicans polish his turds

Trump runs his lie hole for a reason
To cover his vile acts of treason
A tweet he did twit
As he drops a big shit
Cause his taxes the congress is seizin

Humpty Trumpy he built wall
From upon it he had a great fall
His supporters they sigh
While ignoring his lies
As Trump tweets from a new restroom stall.

Trump's Wall Can Be Easily Climbed

Why Traitors Should Be Executed

Traitors present an even greater threat than enemy combatants and foreign enemies because they are nearly impossible to defend against. After convicted in a court or by military tribunal, a traitor should then be thoroughly interrogated and then publicly executed by the most gruesome means.



As it stands today, there needs to be mass executions starting at the highest levels and moving down to the lowliest right wing internet troll. Had President Lincoln finished the job during the occupation a large percentage of the racist gene would have been purged from the gene pool. 

The corporate thugs who have bought our government are guilty of treason and should be executed.

The racist Nazi type weakens America and therefore should be executed. Since the goal of Nazis is to exterminate non white Americans it should be legal to shoot them where ever you find them.

The current Republican leadership is mobbed up with foreign enemies such as the now Russian owned NRA and therefore should be executed for treason. Anyone who does not disavow the NRA is a traitor. 

Unless and until Republican denounce their traitorous party, they should be tried and executed.

Spay and Neuter Trump Supporters

Trump supporters and the Republican base in general is more vile, depraved and evil than most people realize. People chalk it up to, poor education, ignorance, low IQ, Fox News and other right wing propaganda. While all that plays a role, these scumbags were simply no good to the moment they slithered out of their mother's fuck hole. 

Depravity is often genetic. These subhumans should not be allowed to breed and the sooner they die, the better all decent people will be. We can't allow this trash to procreate. We tolerated them for far too long. President Lincoln should have dropped the hammer on them at the end of the Civil War. Humans have culled animals for 1000's of years and with good results. We turned the wolf into useful and safe breeds of dogs. Trump supporters come from the shallow end of the gene pool. Pour in some Clorox!

A Few More Republican Bashing Memes

Social Media Censorship By Mob Rule

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Jeffrey Epstein Blackmail List

Jeffrey Epstein, Blackmail and a Lucrative 'Hot List'

 Jessica Silver-Greenberg, Emily Steel, Jacob Bernstein and David Enrich,The New York Times 7 hours ago 

• Reactions
 
• Reblog on Tumblr
 
• Share
 
• Tweet
 
• Email

Soon after sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein died in August, a mysterious man met with two prominent lawyers.

Towering, barrel-chested and wild-bearded, he was a prodigious drinker and often wore flip-flops. He went by a pseudonym, Patrick Kessler — a necessity, he said, given the shadowy, dangerous world that he inhabited.

He told the lawyers he had something incendiary: a vast archive of Epstein’s data, stored on encrypted servers overseas. He said he had years of the financier’s communications and financial records — as well as thousands of hours of footage from hidden cameras in the bedrooms of Epstein’s properties. The videos, Kessler said, captured some of the world’s richest, most powerful men in compromising sexual situations — even in the act of rape.

Kessler said he wanted to expose these men. If he was telling the truth, his trove could answer one of the Epstein saga’s most baffling questions: How did a college dropout and high school math teacher amass what was said to be a nine-figure fortune? One persistent but unproven theory was that he ran a sprawling blackmail operation. That would explain why moguls, scientists, political leaders and a royal stayed loyal to him, in some cases even after he first went to jail.

Kessler’s tale was enough to hook the two lawyers, famed litigator David Boies and his friend John Stanley Pottinger. If Kessler was authentic, his videos would arm them with immense leverage over some very important people.

Boies and Pottinger discussed a plan. They could use the supposed footage in litigation or to try to reach deals with men who appeared in it, with money flowing into a charitable foundation. In encrypted chats with Kessler, Pottinger referred to a roster of potential targets as the “hot list.” He described hypothetical plans in which the lawyers would pocket up to 40% of the settlements and could extract money from wealthy men by flipping from representing victims to representing those accused of abusing them.

The possibilities were tantalizing — and extended beyond vindicating victims. Pottinger saw a chance to supercharge his law practice. For Boies, there was a shot at redemption, after years of criticism for his work on behalf of Theranos and Harvey Weinstein.

In the end, there would be no damning videos, no funds pouring into a new foundation. Boies and Pottinger would go from toasting Kessler as their “whistleblower” and “informant” to torching him as a “fraudster” and a “spy.”

Kessler was a liar, and he wouldn’t expose any sexual abuse. But he would reveal something else: the extraordinary, at times deceitful measures elite lawyers deployed in an effort to get evidence that could be used to win lucrative settlements — and keep misconduct hidden, allowing perpetrators to abuse again.

Boies has denounced such secret deals as “rich man’s justice,” a way that powerful men buy their way out of legal and reputational jeopardy. This is how it works.

7 Men and a Headless Parrot

The man who called himself Kessler first contacted a Florida lawyer, Bradley Edwards, who was representing women with claims against Epstein. It was late August, about two weeks after the financier killed himself in a jail cell while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges.

Edwards, who did not respond to interview requests, had a law firm called Edwards Pottinger, and he soon referred Kessler to his New York partner. Silver-haired and 79, Pottinger had been a senior civil-rights official in the Nixon and Ford administrations, but he also dabbled in investment banking and wrote best-selling medical thrillers. He was perhaps best known for having dated Gloria Steinem and Kathie Lee Gifford.

Pottinger recalled that Edwards warned him about Kessler, saying that he was “endearing,” “spooky” and “loves to drink like a fish.”

After an initial discussion with Kessler in Washington, Pottinger briefed Boies — whose firm was also representing accusers in the Epstein case — about the sensational claims. He then invited Kessler to his Manhattan apartment. Kessler admired a wall-mounted frame containing a headless stuffed parrot; on TV, the Philadelphia Eagles were mounting a comeback against the Washington Redskins. Pottinger poured Kessler a glass of WhistlePig whiskey, and the informant began to talk.

In his conversations with Pottinger and, later, Boies, Kessler said his videos featured numerous powerful men who were already linked to Epstein: Ehud Barak, the former Israeli prime minister; Alan Dershowitz, a constitutional lawyer; Prince Andrew; three billionaires; and a prominent chief executive.

All seven men, or their representatives, told The New York Times they never engaged in sexual activity on Epstein’s properties. The Times has no reason to believe Kessler’s supposed footage is real.

In his apartment, Pottinger presented Kessler with a signed copy of “The Boss,” his 2005 novel. “One minute you’re bending the rules,” blares the cover of the paperback version. “The next minute you’re breaking the law.” On the title page, Pottinger wrote: “Here’s to the great work you are to do. Happy to be part of it.”

Pottinger also gave Kessler a draft contract to bring him on as a client, allowing him to use a fake name. “For reasons revealed to you, I prefer to proceed with this engagement under the name Patrick Kessler,” the agreement said.

Despite the enormities of the Epstein scandal, few of his accusers have gotten a sense of justice or resolution. Pottinger thought Kessler’s files could change everything. This strange man was theatrical and liked his alcohol, but if there was even a chance his claims were true, they were worth pursuing.

“Our clients are said to be liars and prostitutes,” Pottinger later said in an interview with The Times, “and we now have someone who says, ‘I can give you secret photographic proof of abuse that will completely change the entire fabric of your practice and get justice for these girls.’ And you think that we wouldn’t try to get that?”

Legal Royalty

Pottinger and Boies have known each other for years, a friendship forged on bike trips in France and Italy. In legal circles, Boies was royalty: He was the one who fought for presidential candidate Al Gore before the Supreme Court, took on Microsoft in a landmark antitrust case and helped obtain the right for gays and lesbians to marry in California.

But then Boies got involved with the blood-testing startup Theranos. As the company was being revealed as a fraud, he tried to bully whistleblowers into not speaking to a Wall Street Journal reporter and he was criticized for possible conflicts of interest when he joined the company’s board in 2015.

Two years later, Boies helped his longtime client Harvey Weinstein hire private investigators who intimidated sources and trailed reporters for The Times and The New Yorker — even though Boies’ firm had worked for The Times on other matters. (The Times fired his firm.)

By 2019, Boies, 78, was representing a number of Epstein’s accusers. They got his services pro bono, and he got the chance to burnish his legacy. When Pottinger contacted him about Kessler, he was intrigued.

On Sept. 9, Boies greeted Kessler at the offices of his law firm, Boies Schiller Flexner, in a gleaming new skyscraper at Hudson Yards on Manhattan’s West Side. Kessler unfurled a fantastic story, one he would embroider and alter in later weeks, that began with him growing up somewhere within a three-hour radius of Washington. Kessler said he had been molested as a boy by a Bible school teacher and sought solace on the internet, where he fell in with a group of victims turned hackers, who used their skills to combat pedophilia.

Kessler claimed that a technology executive had introduced him to Epstein, who in 2012 hired Kessler to set up encrypted servers to preserve his extensive digital archives. With Epstein dead, Kessler boasted to the lawyers, he had unfettered access to the material. He said the volume of videos was overwhelming: more than a decade of round-the-clock footage from dozens of cameras.

Kessler displayed some pixelated video stills on his phone. In one, a bearded man with his mouth open appears to be having sex with a naked woman. Kessler said the man was Barak. In another, a man with black-framed glasses is seen shirtless with a woman on his lap, her breasts exposed. Kessler said it was Dershowitz. He also said that some of the supposed videos appeared to have been edited and cataloged for the purpose of blackmail.

“This was explosive information if true, for lots and lots of people,” Boies said.

Boies and Pottinger had decades of legal experience and considered themselves experts at assessing witnesses’ credibility. While they couldn’t be sure, they thought Kessler was probably legit.

A Ploy to Sway an Election

Within hours of the Hudson Yards meeting, Pottinger sent Kessler a series of texts over the encrypted messaging app Signal.

According to excerpts viewed by The Times, Pottinger and Kessler discussed a plan to disseminate some of the informant’s materials — starting with the supposed footage of Barak. The Israeli election was barely a week away, and Barak was challenging Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The images said to be of Barak might be able to sway the election — and fetch a high price. (“Total lie with no basis in reality,” Barak said when asked about the existence of such videos.)

“Can you review your visual evidence to be sure some or all is indisputably him? If so, we can make it work,” Pottinger wrote.

Kessler said he would do so. Pottinger sent a yellow smiley-face emoji with its tongue sticking out.

“Can you share your contact that would be purchasing?” Kessler asked.

“Sheldon Adelson,” Pottinger said.

Adelson, a billionaire casino magnate in Las Vegas, had founded one of Israel’s largest newspapers, and it was an enthusiastic booster of Netanyahu. Pottinger wrote that he and Boies hoped to fly to Nevada to meet with Adelson to discuss the images.

“Do you believe that adelson has the pull to insure this will hurt his bid for election?” Kessler asked the next morning.

Pottinger reassured him. “There is no question that Adelson has the capacity to air the truth about EB if he wants to,” he said, using Barak’s initials. He said he planned to discuss the matter with Boies that evening.

Boies confirmed that they discussed sharing the photo with Adelson but said the plan was never executed. Boaz Bismuth, the editor-in-chief of the newspaper, Israel Hayom, said that its journalists were approached by an Israeli source who pitched them supposed images of Barak but that “we were not interested.”

‘Wealthy Wrongdoers’

The men whom Kessler claimed to have on tape were together worth many billions. Some of their public relations teams had spent months trying to tamp down media coverage of their connections to Epstein. Imagine how much they might pay to make incriminating videos vanish.

You might think that lawyers representing abuse victims would want to publicly expose such information to bolster their clients’ claims. But that is not how the legal industry always works. Often, keeping things quiet is good business.

One of the revelations of the #MeToo era has been that victims’ lawyers often brokered secret deals in which men accused of abuse paid to keep their accusers quiet and the allegations out of the public sphere. Lawyers can pocket at least a third of such settlements, profiting off a system that masks misconduct and allows men to abuse again.

Boies and Pottinger said in interviews that they were looking into creating a charity to help victims of sexual abuse. It would be bankrolled by private legal settlements with the men on the videos.

Boies acknowledged that Kessler might get paid. “If we were able to use this to help our victims recover money, we would treat him generously,” he said in September. He said that his firm would not get a cut of any settlements.

Such agreements would have made it less likely that videos involving the men became public. “Generally what settlements are about is getting peace,” Boies said.

Pottinger told Kessler that the charity he was setting up would be called the Astria Foundation — a name he later said his girlfriend came up with, in a nod to Astraea, the Greek goddess of innocence and justice. “We need to get it funded by abusers,” Pottinger texted, noting in another message that “these are wealthy wrongdoers.”

Pottinger asked Kessler to start compiling incriminating materials on a specific group of men.

“I’m way ahead of you,” Kessler responded. He said he had asked his team of hackers to search the files for the three billionaires, the CEO and Prince Andrew.

“Yes, that’s exactly how to do this,” Pottinger said. “Videos for sure but email traffic, too.”

“I call it our hot list,” he added.

An Invitation to Reporters

In mid-September, Boies and Pottinger invited reporters from The Times to the Boies Schiller offices to meet Kessler. The threat of a major news organization writing about the videos — and confirming the existence of an extensive surveillance apparatus — could greatly enhance the lawyers’ leverage over the wealthy men.

Before the session, Pottinger urged Kessler to focus on certain men, like Barak, while avoiding others. Referring to the reporters, he added: “Let them drink from a fountain instead of a water hose. They and the readers will follow that better.”

The meeting took place on a cloudy Saturday morning. After agreeing to leave their phones and laptops outside, the reporters entered a 20th-floor conference room. Kessler was huge: more than 6 feet tall, nearly 300 pounds, balding, his temples speckled with gray. He told his story and presented images that he said were of Epstein, Barak and Dershowitz having sex with women.

Barely an hour after the session ended, the Times reporters received an email from Kessler: “Are you free?” He said he wanted to meet — alone. “Tell no one else.” That afternoon, they met at Grand Sichuan, an iconic Chinese restaurant in Manhattan’s Chelsea neighborhood. The lunch rush was over, and the trio sat at a quiet table in the back. A small group of women huddled nearby, speaking Mandarin and snipping the ends off string beans.

Kessler complained that Boies and Pottinger were more interested in making money than in exposing wrongdoers. He pulled out his phone, warned the reporters not to touch it, and showed more of what he had. There was a color photo of a bare-chested, gray-haired man with a slight smile. Kessler said it was a billionaire. He also showed blurry, black-and-white images of a dark-haired man receiving oral sex. He said it was a prominent CEO.

Soup dumplings and Gui Zhou chicken arrived, and Kessler kept talking. He said he had found financial ledgers on Epstein’s servers that showed he had vast amounts of bitcoins and cash in the Middle East and Bangkok, and hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of gold, silver and diamonds. He presented no proof. But it is common for whistleblowers to be erratic and slow to produce their evidence, and The Times thought it was worth investigating Kessler’s claims.

The conversation continued in a conference room at a Washington hotel five days later, after a text exchange in which Kessler noted his enthusiasm for Japanese whiskey. Both parties brought bottles to the hotel, and Kessler spent nearly eight hours downing glass after glass. He veered from telling tales about the dark web to professing love for “Little House on the Prairie.” He asserted that he had evidence Epstein had derived his wealth through illicit means. At one point, he showed what he said were classified CIA documents.

Kessler said he had no idea who the women in the videos were or how the lawyers might identify them to act on their behalf. From his perspective, he said, it seemed as if Boies and Pottinger were plotting to use his footage to demand huge sums from billionaires. He said that it looked like blackmail — and that he could prove it.

‘We Keep Everything’

Was Kessler’s story plausible? Did America’s best-connected sexual predator accumulate incriminating videos of powerful men?

Two women who spent time in Epstein’s homes said the answer was yes. In an unpublished memoir, Virginia Giuffre, who accused Epstein of making her a “sex slave,” wrote that she discovered a room in his New York mansion where monitors displayed real-time surveillance footage. And Maria Farmer, an artist who accused Epstein of sexually assaulting her when she worked for him in the 1990s, said that Epstein once walked her through the mansion, pointing out pin-size cameras that he said were in every room.

“I said, ‘Are you recording all this?’” Farmer said in an interview. “He said: ‘Yes. We keep it. We keep everything.’”

During a 2005 search of Epstein’s Palm Beach, Florida, estate, the police found two cameras hidden in clocks — one in the garage and the other next to his desk, according to police reports. But no other cameras were found.

If such a surveillance system did exist, nothing that Kessler told or showed The Times proved that he had access to it. The photos he shared were too grainy to establish anyone’s identity. And many elements of his story failed to hold up under scrutiny.

Kessler claimed to have been an early investor in a North Carolina coffee company, whose sticker was affixed to his laptop. But its founder said no one matching Kessler’s description had ever been affiliated with the company. Kessler insisted that he invested in 2009, but the company wasn’t founded until 2011.

The contents of Kessler’s supposed CIA documents turned out to be easily findable using Google. At one point, Kessler said that one of his associates had been missing and was found dead; later, Kessler said the man was alive and in the United States. He said that his mother had died when he was young — and that he had recently given her a hug. A photo he sent from what he said was a Washington-area hospital featured a distinctive blanket, but when The Times called local hospitals, they didn’t recognize the pattern.

After months of effort, The Times could not learn Kessler’s identity or confirm any element of his back story.

“I am very often being purposefully inconsistent,” Kessler said, when pressed.

The Lawyers Seek a Deal

On the last Friday in September, Boies and Pottinger sat on a blue leather couch in the corner of a members-only dining room at the Harvard Club in midtown Manhattan. Antlered animal heads and oil paintings hung from the dark wooden walls.

The lawyers were there to make a deal with The Times. Tired of waiting for Kessler’s mother lode, Pottinger said they planned to send a team overseas to download the material from his servers. He said he had alerted the FBI and a prosecutor in the U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan.

Boies told an editor for The Times that they would be willing to share everything, on one condition: They would have discretion over which men could be written about, and when. He explained that if compromising videos about particular men became public, that could torpedo litigation or attempts to negotiate settlements. The Times editor didn’t commit.

Boies and Pottinger later said those plans had hinged on verifying the videos’ authenticity and on having clients with legitimate legal claims against the men. Otherwise, legal experts said, it might have crossed the line into extortion.

The meeting was interrupted when Bob Weinstein, the brother of Harvey Weinstein, bounded up to the table and plopped onto the couch next to Boies. The two men spent several minutes talking, laughing and slapping each other on the back.

While Boies and Weinstein chatted, Pottinger furtively displayed the black-and-white shot of a man in glasses having sex. Both lawyers said it looked like Dershowitz.

A Phone Call

One day in late September, Dershowitz’s secretary relayed a message: Someone named Patrick Kessler wanted to speak to him about Boies.

The two lawyers had a long-running feud, and Dershowitz returned the call from his apartment. He also recorded it. Kessler explained his Epstein story and said he no longer trusted Boies and Pottinger.

“The problem is that they don’t want to move forward with any of these people legally,” Kessler said. “They’re just interested in trying to settle and take a cut.”

“Who are these people that you have on videotape?” Dershowitz asked.

“There’s a lot of people,” Kessler said, naming a few powerful men. He added, “There’s a long list of people that they want me to have that I don’t have.”

“Who?” Dershowitz asked. “Did they ask about me?”

“Of course they asked about you. You know that, sir.”

“And you don’t have anything on me, right?”

“I do not, no,” Kessler said.

“Because I never, I never had sex with anybody,” Dershowitz said. Later in the call, he added: “I am completely clean. I was at Jeffrey’s house. I stayed there. But I didn’t have any sex with anybody.”

What was the purpose of Kessler’s phone call? Why did he tell Dershowitz that he wasn’t on the supposed surveillance tapes, contradicting what he had said and showed to Boies, Pottinger and The Times? Did the call sound a little rehearsed?

Dershowitz said that he didn’t know why Kessler contacted him and that the call was the only time the two men ever spoke. When The Times showed him one of Kessler’s photos, in which a bespectacled man resembling Dershowitz appears to be having sex, Dershowitz laughed and said the man wasn’t him. His wife, Carolyn Cohen, peeked at the photo, too.

“You don’t keep your glasses on when you’re doing that,” she said.

Encrypted Files and a Warning

In October, Kessler said he was ready to produce the Epstein files. He told The Times that he had created duplicate versions of Epstein’s servers. He laid out detailed plans for them to be shipped by boat to the United States and for one of his associates — a very short Icelandic man named Steven — to deliver them to The Times headquarters at 11 a.m. on Oct. 3.

Kessler warned that he was erecting a maze of security systems. First, a Times employee would need to use a special thumb drive to access a proprietary communications system. Then Kessler’s colleague would transmit a code to decrypt the files. If his instructions weren’t followed precisely, Kessler said, the information would self-destruct.

Specialists at The Times set up a number of “air-gapped” laptops — disconnected from the internet — in a windowless, padlocked meeting room. Reporters cleared their schedules to sift through thousands of hours of surveillance footage.

On the day of the scheduled delivery, Kessler sent a series of frantic texts. Disaster had struck. A fire was burning. The duplicate servers were destroyed. A team member was missing. He was fleeing to Ukraine.

Two hours later, Kessler was in touch with Pottinger and didn’t mention any emergency. He said he hoped that the footage would help pry $1 billion in settlements out of their targets and asked him to detail how the lawyers could extract the money. “Could you put together a hypothetical situation,” Kessler wrote, not something “set in stone but close to what your thinking.”

Pottinger obliged — and walked into what looked like a trap. He described two hypotheticals, both of which were consistent with what had been discussed with The Times at the Harvard Club.

In one, which he called a “standard model” for legal settlements, the money would be split among his clients, the Astria Foundation, Kessler and the lawyers, who would get up to 40%.

In the second hypothetical, Pottinger wrote, the lawyers would approach the videotaped men. The men would then hire the lawyers, ensuring that they would not get sued, and “make a contribution to a nonprofit as part of the retainer.”

“No client is actually involved in this structure,” Pottinger said, noting that the arrangement would have to be “consistent with and subject to rules of ethics.”

“Thank you very much,” Kessler said.

Pottinger later said that the scenario would have involved him representing a victim, settling a case and then representing the man accused of abusing the victim. He said it was within legal boundaries. (He also said he had meant to type “No client lawsuit is actually involved.”)

Such legal arrangements are not unheard-of. Lawyers representing a former Fox News producer who had accused Bill O’Reilly of sexual harassment reached a settlement in which her lawyers agreed to work for O’Reilly after the dispute. But legal experts generally consider such setups to be unethical because they can create conflicts between the interests of the lawyers and their original clients.

‘Loose Language’

The lawyers held out hope of getting Kessler’s materials. But weeks passed, and nothing arrived. At one point, Pottinger volunteered to meet Kessler anywhere — including Ljubljana, the capital of Slovenia.

“I still believe he is what he purported to be,” Boies wrote in an email Nov. 7. “I have to evaluate people for my day job, and he seemed too genuine to be a fake, and I very much want him to be real.” He added, “I am not unconscious of the danger of wanting to believe something too much.”

Ten days later, Boies arrived at The Times for an interview. It was a chilly Sunday, and Boies had just flown in from Ecuador, where, he said, he was doing work for the Finance Ministry. Reporters wanted to ask him if his and Pottinger’s conduct with Kessler crossed ethical lines.

Would they have brokered secret settlements that buried evidence of wrongdoing? Did the notion of extracting huge sums from men in exchange for keeping sex tapes hidden meet the definition of extortion?

Boies said the answer to both questions was no. He said he and Pottinger operated well within the law. They only intended to pursue legal action on behalf of their clients — in other words, that they were a long way from extortion. In any case, he said, he and Pottinger had never authenticated any of the imagery or identified any of the supposed victims, much less contacted any of the men on the “hot list.”

Then The Times showed Boies some of the text exchanges between Pottinger and Kessler. Boies showed a flash of anger and said it was the first time he was seeing them.

By the end of the nearly four-hour interview, Boies had concluded that Kessler was probably a con man: “I think that he was a fraudster who was just trying to set things up.” And he argued that Kessler had baited Pottinger into writing things that looked more nefarious than they really were. He acknowledged that Pottinger had used “loose language” in some of his messages that risked creating the impression that the lawyers were plotting to monetize evidence of abuse.

Several days later, Boies returned for another interview and was more critical of Pottinger, especially the hypothetical plans that he had described to Kessler. “Having looked at all that stuff in context, I would not have said that,” he said. How did Boies feel about Pottinger invoking his name in messages to Kessler? “I don’t like it,” he said.

But Boies stopped short of blaming Pottinger for the whole mess. “I’m being cautious not to throw him under the bus more than I believe is accurate,” he said. His longtime PR adviser, Dawn Schneider, who had been pushing for a more forceful denunciation, dropped her pen, threw up her arms and buried her head in her hands.

In a separate interview, The Times asked Pottinger about his correspondence with Kessler. The lawyer said that his messages shouldn’t be taken at face value because, in reality, he had been deceiving Kessler all along — “misleading him deliberately in order to get the servers.”

The draft retention agreement that Pottinger had given to Kessler in September was unsigned and never meant to be honored, Pottinger said. And he never intended to sell photos of Barak to Adelson. “I just pulled it out of my behind,” he said, calling it an act to impress Kessler.

As for the two hypotheticals about how to get money out of the men on the list, Pottinger said, he never planned to do what he carefully articulated. “I didn’t owe Patrick honesty about this,” he said.

Pottinger said that he had only one regret — that “we did not get the information that this liar said he had.”

He added, “I’m building legal cases here. I’m trying not to engage too much in shenanigans. I wish I didn’t, but this guy was very unusual.”

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

© 2019 The New York Times Company

The Write In David Duke Campaign Is Picking Up Steam

The following came from a White Supremacist news letter. Even some racists are sick of Trump.



If you are a true White Supremacist, Skinhead, Klansman, Neo Nazi, Member of the Proud Boys or White Nationalist you should vote your conscious and write in David Duke. Trump is going to lose anyway so why not send a message to the Republican party that White America will not tolerate the browning of America. Hell, even that Negro Obama deported more swarthy Mexicans in his first year than Trump has so far.



Again, Trump can't win and even if he did he would be as dangerous to the White race as a Democrat. He's surrounded by Jews and Wops like Giuliani.


When the votes are tallied and state the RNCs see the power of the White vote they will be more selective in when choosing the right thinking candidates for federal, state county town and city offices. The worst kept secret in the world is that Republican voters are not racists. Republicans are closet racists who need to come out of their closets, come to their senses, say what they really think and loudly and proudly at the top of their lungs shout WHITE POWER WHITE POWER!

This is parody.

Engage The MAGAts

This nightmare is about more than Trump. The depravity that allowed Trump to come to power has been growing for quite some time. There was a time many decades ago when most Republicans were not contemptible scum bags. That was when many elected officials in both parties were from the World War 2 generations aka the greatest generation.

Today we are in the post truth era and we are in the vulgar greed era. Trump really woke up and cultivated growing the depravity that was always in the soul of the Republican party. So wake up Mary Poppins, some people are no damn good and a total waste of protoplasm. The only thing that technically makes them human is their DNA.

Trump supporters are: Racists - Bigots - Liars - Vulgar - Treacherous - Traitorous - Ignorant - Small-minded - Disdainful of the truth - Evil

It is impossible in these times for an actual competent moral conservative to be nominated by the Republican party. Case in point is Republican presidential nominee John Kasich. The Republican base rejected him because he was intelligent, moral, competent experienced and honest. Instead the split between lyin Ted Cruz and traitorous Trump. Trump is a much bigger scumbag than even Ted Cruz and because the GOP base is so morally depraved and intellectually lazy and intellectually dishonest they chose the absolute worst person ever to be the presidential nominee for their party.



If you think that there is good in everyone, you are a fucking fool and you need a fact enema followed by powerful red pills followed a great big giant glass of reality juice. We like to blame Hitler for the holocaust when in fact the holocaust we done by the German people. We like to blame the Civil War on racism when the cause of the Civil war was the depravity and greed of the Southern aristocracy and the stupidity of poor low IQ White trash Southerners. The South is still a shit hole because the White Southerner is a product of defective European stock.



How Do We Engage The MAGAts?

1. Let's start by doing what they do. Let's flag any and all right wing videos on YouTube. Since Youtube censoring operates by mob rule we need to organize flagging attacks on all alt-right channels.

2. Trigger the trash. Call, fax and snail mail every Republican member of congress at their DC office as well as their local office. US Google Phone because in most cases call ID won't detect it. DO NOT threaten anyone but do be firm, factual and do what you can to demoralize the punk who picks up the phone.

3. Attend Trump rallies and video tape the MAGAts and their cars' plates and VIN numbers. If the confront you give them the silent treatment. If they get physical either take one for the team or defend yourself with whatever force you deem necessary. Have the MAGAt arrested and if it is a felony assault and they are convicted they will never be allowed to vote again. Is it worth a few lumps to get a MAGAt out of the game.

4. Be creative. 

5. Start a blog like this one. 

6. Video record outside local politician offices and campaign offices. If confronted give the MAGAts the silent treatment. It will drive them nuts.

7. Send letters to the editor. 

8. Protest outside of GOP local offices. 

9. Work for the Trump campaign and monkey wrench them.

10. Don't let those bastards breath.

Tucker Carlson Brags That Trump is 'a full-blown BS artist'

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/tucker-carlson-says-trump-is-a-full-blown-bs-artist-042056499.html

On Wednesday night, Fox News host Tucker Carlson actually agreed with many media outlets and admitted that President Trump has been less than truthful with the American people. According to the Washington Post, as of last month, Trump had told over 13,000 false or misleading statements since taking office, including claims by the president and those in his administration that his was the largest inaugural crowd in U.S. history. After nearly three years, Carlson refuted that claim.

“We’re not gonna lie to you, that was untrue,” Carlson said. “The crowd at the 2017 inauguration was not the largest ever measured at the National Mall. Sorry, it wasn’t. Why did the president claim that it was? Well, because that’s who he is.” Carlson went on to say, “Donald Trump is a salesman, he’s a talker, a boaster, a booster, a compulsive self-promoter. At times he’s a full-blown BS artist.”

And though it may seem Carlson was trashing the president, he was actually making the case that it’s okay for Trump to be untruthful because “that’s who he is,” and because, as Carlson pointed out, it’s obvious.

“If Trump hadn’t gotten rich in real estate, he could have made a fortune selling cars,” Carlson said. “Most people know this. It’s obvious. It’s transparent, really. What Tucker Carlson was thinking. "I admire liars. Why do you think I work for Fox News."