Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Media Lies and Bias Against Furry Potato

On left army vet and accountability auditor Furry Potato.
The guy on the right is the trigger happy guard who shot Furry. 
I sent the following message to the rag known as LA Times. Like other corporate media trash, the LA Times mis-characterized editorialized and otherwise lied about the events leading up to the shooting of Zhoie Perez aka Furry Potato outside the Etz Jacob Congregation/Ohel Chana tax exempt synagogue which also doubles as a school.. a school with no transparent windows. CommsDept@latimes.com


The first lie is that there was an argument. Furry did not speak with the shooter. Stop hiring millennial punks who are barely literate as reporters and journalists. 

The second lie was when the propagandist posing a reporter referred to Furry as a "self-described" first amendment auditor. Furry is a first amendment auditor along with 100's of other auditors and government accountability auditors. We would not need people like Furry of you corporate media slackers did your job.

Lie 3: The propagandist posing as a reporter put the words, deep graze in quotes when describing Furry's wound. Maybe it would be a good idea to show the wound. It was a deep graze and had the round hit Furry's leg more squarely it could have hit her femoral artery and she could have bled to death.

Lie 4: The propagandist said Fury was dressed in black when Furry was dressed in light gray. 

Lie 4: Instead of editorializing and Foxxing the facts the LA times could have posted a link to the entire video. 

Congratulations LA Times you and your editorial staff will be featured on the Sleazy Bastards site with instruction on how to view your content with ad blocking. Before that happens I hope there is a retraction and corrections and I hope to see the firing of the following inept "reporters".
ALEJANDRA REYES-VELARDEJAMES QUEALLY and JAVIER PANZAR 

If I don't hear from the LA Times with an honest explanation, 
I will publish my story about LA Times bias against LGBTQ folks and defenders of the US constitution. I will further contact the DOJ because the biased slant of the article it tantamount to jury tampering and jury nullification.  

1 comment: